Abstract
Background Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are prone to drug resistance after multiple lines of treatment, resulting in poor prognosis. Aponermin, the world's first DR4/DR5 agonist, induces P53-independent apoptosis by activating death receptors and is approved for RRMM (Dhillon S, Drugs, 2024; Xia Z, Leng Y, Fang B, BMC Cancer, 2023). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aponermin combined with immunomodulators (IMiDs) in RRMM.
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a real-world cohort study involving 38 RRMM patients from eight centers in China between September 2024 and July 2025. Treatment regimens included aponermin plus carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (Apo-KTd); aponermin plus carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (Apo-KPd); aponermin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Apo-Pd); aponermin plus thalidomide and dexamethasone (Apo-Td), and other combination therapies based on aponermin. The dosage of aponermin was uniformly set at 10 mg/kg, administered via intravenous infusion on days 1–5, combined with other drugs at standard doses.
Results The cohort consisted of male/female: 21/17; median age was 63 years (range: 30–83 years); median prior lines of therapy were 4 lines (34.2% received ≥5 lines). TP53 deletion/mutation was present in 13.2%, while extramedullary disease occurred in 63.2%. After a median of 3 (range: 2-8) cycles of treatment, the overall response rate (ORR) was 55.3%. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients aged <63 years had significantly better outcomes compared to those aged ≥63 years (ORR: 72.2% vs. 40.0%, P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between patients with or without extramedullary disease regarding ORR rates (62.5% vs. 42.8%, P>0.05), prior CAR-T therapy status regarding ORR rates (71.4% vs. 51.6%, P>0.05); TP53 abnormalities regarding ORR rates (60.0% vs. 60.1%); or presence/absence of 1q21 amplification regarding ORR rates (70.0% vs. 60.1%, P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with ≥3 and <3 cycles (ORR 56.5% vs. 53.3%, P>0.05). The median PFS was significantly longer in those receiving ≥3 cycles than those receiving <3 cycles (4.5 months vs. 2 months, P<0.05). In terms of safety, 53.8% of patients had hematological toxicity (≥3 grade 28.2%), 23.1% had abnormal liver function (≥3 grade 7.7%), and the incidence of tumor lysis syndrome was 5.1%. All adverse events were manageable, and no treatment-related death occurred.
Conclusion Aponermin combined with immunomodulators demonstrates good tolerability and definite efficacy for RRMM, especially for long-term treatment. Patients with high-risk cytogenetics, extramedullary lesions, and those who have failed multiple lines of treatment can still benefit.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal